"So the Supreme Court's latest decision on ICE basically lets immigration officers do this to people. It's a type of racial profiling that could lead minorities, especially people of Hispanic descent, to feel like they need to carry their papers with them. And just as Kavanaugh says, it's not a big deal. So let's break it down. On Monday, SCOTUS overturned a federal judge's order that stopped restrictions on ICE rates in LA. The federal judge said that ICE stopping people to ask them about their immigration status was unconstitutional if it was based on at least one of these four main factors. Whether apparent race or ethnicity, whether they were speaking English with an accent or spoke Spanish, being at a certain location like a farm or a day worker pickup site like Home Depot, or even what kind of work that they do. The lower federal court said that stopping people based on those four things is unconstitutional and ICE can't do that, likely because it violates the Fourth Amendment, which here means the government can't stop you or detain you unless it has reasonable suspicion to do so. So those four factors are not reasonably suspicious reasons. After an appeals court didn't block the federal judge's order, the Trump administration made an emergency plea to the Supreme Court. They said hanging the prospect of contempt over every immigration stop would prevent ICE from doing its job in LA if they were so worried about violating the court's ruling. And this is where it actually gets kind of jaw-dropping. The Republican-appointed majority in SCOTUS effectively said in a 6-3 decision that the Trump administration, for now, can do what it wants when it stops someone in LA, at least while the larger mass deportation case is being litigated in the courts. And Justice Kavanaugh argued that the ICE tactics likely didn't violate the Fourth Amendment. And that immigration officers may not just look at using one of those four factors the federal judge banned. And that basically, immigration officers will be afraid of having one of their stops scrutinized in court, and they won't do their job. The logic being, like, say they use a different factor in stops, but then the court says actually that was racial profiling. Plus, he said that if you get stopped by ICE, it's not a big deal, there's no harm, especially if you're here legally, you'll be freed promptly, it's a modest encounter. Liberal Justice Sotomayor, in her dissent, quoted a 1975 case that said it was unconstitutional for Border Patrol to stop and question people in a car because they appeared to be Mexican. And that now, that may no longer be true. And she refuses to stand idly by while constitutional freedoms are lost. So for now, if you look a certain way, speak a certain way, work a certain job, exist in a certain space, your immigration status is suspicious, and what happens next could put you at risk."